Algorithm-assisted decision-making in the public sector: framing the issues using administrative law rules governing discretionary power

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article considers some of the risks and challenges raised by the use of algorithm-assisted decision-making and predictive tools by the public sector. Alongside, it reviews a number of long-standing English administrative law rules designed to regulate the discretionary power of the state. The principles of administrative law are concerned with human decisions involved in the exercise of state power and discretion, thus offering a promising avenue for the regulation of the growing number of algorithm-assisted decisions within the public sector. This article attempts to re-frame key rules for the new algorithmic environment and argues that 'old' law-interpreted for a new context-can help guide lawyers, scientists and public sector practitioners alike when considering the development and deployment of new algorithmic tools. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The growing ubiquity of algorithms in society: implications, impacts and innovations'.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages20
JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A
Volume376
Issue number2128
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Sep 2018

Keywords

  • Algorithms
  • Public sector
  • Law
  • Predictions

Cite this

@article{9e98a1918492491d9a23bf3575135672,
title = "Algorithm-assisted decision-making in the public sector: framing the issues using administrative law rules governing discretionary power",
abstract = "This article considers some of the risks and challenges raised by the use of algorithm-assisted decision-making and predictive tools by the public sector. Alongside, it reviews a number of long-standing English administrative law rules designed to regulate the discretionary power of the state. The principles of administrative law are concerned with human decisions involved in the exercise of state power and discretion, thus offering a promising avenue for the regulation of the growing number of algorithm-assisted decisions within the public sector. This article attempts to re-frame key rules for the new algorithmic environment and argues that 'old' law-interpreted for a new context-can help guide lawyers, scientists and public sector practitioners alike when considering the development and deployment of new algorithmic tools. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The growing ubiquity of algorithms in society: implications, impacts and innovations'.",
keywords = "Algorithms, Public sector, Law, Predictions",
author = "Marion Oswald",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1098/rsta.2017.0359",
language = "English",
volume = "376",
number = "2128",

}

Algorithm-assisted decision-making in the public sector: framing the issues using administrative law rules governing discretionary power. / Oswald, Marion.

Vol. 376, No. 2128, 13.09.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Algorithm-assisted decision-making in the public sector: framing the issues using administrative law rules governing discretionary power

AU - Oswald, Marion

PY - 2018/9/13

Y1 - 2018/9/13

N2 - This article considers some of the risks and challenges raised by the use of algorithm-assisted decision-making and predictive tools by the public sector. Alongside, it reviews a number of long-standing English administrative law rules designed to regulate the discretionary power of the state. The principles of administrative law are concerned with human decisions involved in the exercise of state power and discretion, thus offering a promising avenue for the regulation of the growing number of algorithm-assisted decisions within the public sector. This article attempts to re-frame key rules for the new algorithmic environment and argues that 'old' law-interpreted for a new context-can help guide lawyers, scientists and public sector practitioners alike when considering the development and deployment of new algorithmic tools. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The growing ubiquity of algorithms in society: implications, impacts and innovations'.

AB - This article considers some of the risks and challenges raised by the use of algorithm-assisted decision-making and predictive tools by the public sector. Alongside, it reviews a number of long-standing English administrative law rules designed to regulate the discretionary power of the state. The principles of administrative law are concerned with human decisions involved in the exercise of state power and discretion, thus offering a promising avenue for the regulation of the growing number of algorithm-assisted decisions within the public sector. This article attempts to re-frame key rules for the new algorithmic environment and argues that 'old' law-interpreted for a new context-can help guide lawyers, scientists and public sector practitioners alike when considering the development and deployment of new algorithmic tools. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The growing ubiquity of algorithms in society: implications, impacts and innovations'.

KW - Algorithms

KW - Public sector

KW - Law

KW - Predictions

U2 - 10.1098/rsta.2017.0359

DO - 10.1098/rsta.2017.0359

M3 - Article

VL - 376

IS - 2128

ER -