Abstract
References to the subjective notion of tranquillity have long been extensively deployed in marketing
literature and in planning policy in relation to both its promotion and its protection, particularly in protected
areas. Whilst a liberal use of the term has ensued, a plethora of research interprets tranquillity
primarily with noise, and where broader interpretations are progressed, traditional, directional questioning
techniques are evident in attempts to understand tranquillity and quantify its features. Surprisingly,
few enquiries have taken a broader, inductive approach to determining the range of stakeholders’ views
and of these even fewer have engaged specifically with local residents and particularly those classed as
hard-to-reach. Using these latter approaches, of the few and most recent studies conducted, the Broadly
Engaging with Tranquillity project provides a replicable framework for determining and mapping tranquillity.
An extensive community engagement process launched the study, using participatory principles
from which stakeholders’ views were modelled using Geographical Information Systems. Results of this
research are reported together with an interpretation of the models created according to four distinct
groups representing views of institutions and members of the public. Similar views are identified amongst
the groups with tranquillity commonly related to natural environments, whereas nontranquillity was
primarily equated to seeing and hearing people and the products of human activity. Yet distinctions are
identified between the four groups that have important implications for who should be involved in determining
local characteristics of tranquillity and for how protected area managers might include nonexpert
views in their understanding and conservation of tranquillity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 185-201 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Landscape and Urban Planning |
Volume | 158 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 18 Nov 2016 |
Keywords
- planning policy
- multiple perspectives
- public participation
- GIS
- 2020