Evidence-based patient/public voice

A patient and public involvement audit in the field of sexual health

Debra Gray, Jane Meyrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background The National Health Institute constitution enshrines the central role of patient and public involvement (PPI) in order to place patients at the heart of the NHS. The sexual health field presents unique challenges for PPI in the tension between current PPI practice versus the need for confidentiality/feelings of shame/stigma. However, there is little evidence around the goals, evaluation measures or theoretical underpinnings of PPI.

Objectives In order to improve current PPI practice in the sexual health field, audits were carried out on PPI plans in both service and research sectors.

Methods 18 local sexual health service contacts completed the audit through snowballing. The tool was refined and five research projects completed the audit from the Health Protection Research Unit in BloodBorne and Sexually Transmitted Infections. Responses were collated and a thematic analysis by two independent researchers carried out. Common areas for improvement were identified.

Results Audit tool responses evidenced wide variability in practice. Issues included conflation of PPI work and qualitative research; limited ‘patient satisfaction’ approaches; lack of PPI goals; methodological reliance on ‘visible’ methods such as focus groups; lack of responsiveness around patient needs and poor resourcing of PPI work. Research specific issues included ‘late’ PPI after key decisions had been made and poor lay summary validity.

Discussion Two audits evidenced a range of areas for improvement of PPI practice in sexual health. Clear definition of ‘what PPI is for’ aligned with evaluation measures would begin to build an evidence base for the contribution of patient voice.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Sep 2018

Keywords

  • Patient involvement
  • Sexual health

Cite this

@article{066a2bc127a5404c8188960bf14268a3,
title = "Evidence-based patient/public voice: A patient and public involvement audit in the field of sexual health",
abstract = "Background The National Health Institute constitution enshrines the central role of patient and public involvement (PPI) in order to place patients at the heart of the NHS. The sexual health field presents unique challenges for PPI in the tension between current PPI practice versus the need for confidentiality/feelings of shame/stigma. However, there is little evidence around the goals, evaluation measures or theoretical underpinnings of PPI.Objectives In order to improve current PPI practice in the sexual health field, audits were carried out on PPI plans in both service and research sectors.Methods 18 local sexual health service contacts completed the audit through snowballing. The tool was refined and five research projects completed the audit from the Health Protection Research Unit in BloodBorne and Sexually Transmitted Infections. Responses were collated and a thematic analysis by two independent researchers carried out. Common areas for improvement were identified.Results Audit tool responses evidenced wide variability in practice. Issues included conflation of PPI work and qualitative research; limited ‘patient satisfaction’ approaches; lack of PPI goals; methodological reliance on ‘visible’ methods such as focus groups; lack of responsiveness around patient needs and poor resourcing of PPI work. Research specific issues included ‘late’ PPI after key decisions had been made and poor lay summary validity.Discussion Two audits evidenced a range of areas for improvement of PPI practice in sexual health. Clear definition of ‘what PPI is for’ aligned with evaluation measures would begin to build an evidence base for the contribution of patient voice.",
keywords = "Patient involvement, Sexual health",
author = "Debra Gray and Jane Meyrick",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200082",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
journal = "BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health",
issn = "2515-1991",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

Evidence-based patient/public voice : A patient and public involvement audit in the field of sexual health. / Gray, Debra; Meyrick, Jane.

In: BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, Vol. 44, No. 4, 18.09.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based patient/public voice

T2 - A patient and public involvement audit in the field of sexual health

AU - Gray, Debra

AU - Meyrick, Jane

PY - 2018/9/18

Y1 - 2018/9/18

N2 - Background The National Health Institute constitution enshrines the central role of patient and public involvement (PPI) in order to place patients at the heart of the NHS. The sexual health field presents unique challenges for PPI in the tension between current PPI practice versus the need for confidentiality/feelings of shame/stigma. However, there is little evidence around the goals, evaluation measures or theoretical underpinnings of PPI.Objectives In order to improve current PPI practice in the sexual health field, audits were carried out on PPI plans in both service and research sectors.Methods 18 local sexual health service contacts completed the audit through snowballing. The tool was refined and five research projects completed the audit from the Health Protection Research Unit in BloodBorne and Sexually Transmitted Infections. Responses were collated and a thematic analysis by two independent researchers carried out. Common areas for improvement were identified.Results Audit tool responses evidenced wide variability in practice. Issues included conflation of PPI work and qualitative research; limited ‘patient satisfaction’ approaches; lack of PPI goals; methodological reliance on ‘visible’ methods such as focus groups; lack of responsiveness around patient needs and poor resourcing of PPI work. Research specific issues included ‘late’ PPI after key decisions had been made and poor lay summary validity.Discussion Two audits evidenced a range of areas for improvement of PPI practice in sexual health. Clear definition of ‘what PPI is for’ aligned with evaluation measures would begin to build an evidence base for the contribution of patient voice.

AB - Background The National Health Institute constitution enshrines the central role of patient and public involvement (PPI) in order to place patients at the heart of the NHS. The sexual health field presents unique challenges for PPI in the tension between current PPI practice versus the need for confidentiality/feelings of shame/stigma. However, there is little evidence around the goals, evaluation measures or theoretical underpinnings of PPI.Objectives In order to improve current PPI practice in the sexual health field, audits were carried out on PPI plans in both service and research sectors.Methods 18 local sexual health service contacts completed the audit through snowballing. The tool was refined and five research projects completed the audit from the Health Protection Research Unit in BloodBorne and Sexually Transmitted Infections. Responses were collated and a thematic analysis by two independent researchers carried out. Common areas for improvement were identified.Results Audit tool responses evidenced wide variability in practice. Issues included conflation of PPI work and qualitative research; limited ‘patient satisfaction’ approaches; lack of PPI goals; methodological reliance on ‘visible’ methods such as focus groups; lack of responsiveness around patient needs and poor resourcing of PPI work. Research specific issues included ‘late’ PPI after key decisions had been made and poor lay summary validity.Discussion Two audits evidenced a range of areas for improvement of PPI practice in sexual health. Clear definition of ‘what PPI is for’ aligned with evaluation measures would begin to build an evidence base for the contribution of patient voice.

KW - Patient involvement

KW - Sexual health

U2 - 10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200082

DO - 10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200082

M3 - Article

VL - 44

JO - BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health

JF - BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health

SN - 2515-1991

IS - 4

ER -