Greater Empathizing and reduced Systemizing in people who show a jumping to conclusions bias in the general population: Implications for psychosis

Mark Brosnan, Chris Ashwin, Tim Gamble

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Females generally perform better than males on some measures of social processing (e.g. Empathizing), while males typically perform better than females on some measures of non-social processing (e.g. Systemizing). Extremes of these sex-typical cognitive profiles are associated with the development and maintenance of certain psychiatric disorders. For example, the autism-psychosis model predicts psychosis spectrum conditions can be characterized as a cognitive pattern of very poor Systemizing alongside superior Empathizing ability (autism demonstrating the diametrically opposing cognitive profile). However, little experimental research has been carried out to date testing the cognitive profile associated with psychosis. Methods: The present study used a large non-clinical sample to investigate the relationship between a "jumping to conclusions" (JTC) reasoning bias commonly seen in patients with delusions and measures of Empathizing and Systemizing. Results: Those showing a JTC bias demonstrated greater Empathizing and reduced Systemizing compared to a non-JTC group, irrespective of biological sex. Sex differences were identified in Empathizing and Systemizing but not the JTC. Conclusions: These results show a cognitive pattern consistent with predictions from the autism-psychosis model. In a non-clinical population, a reasoning bias associated with delusions is associated with an Emphasizing/Systemizing profile opposite to that characteristic of autism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-81
Number of pages11
JournalPsychosis
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • clinical psychology
  • delusions
  • Empathizing
  • global/local processing
  • hyper-mentalizing
  • jumping to conclusions
  • psychosis
  • Systemizing
  • theory of mind

Cite this

@article{f2fb8c6898ca40f6990bde302cafbc51,
title = "Greater Empathizing and reduced Systemizing in people who show a jumping to conclusions bias in the general population: Implications for psychosis",
abstract = "Background: Females generally perform better than males on some measures of social processing (e.g. Empathizing), while males typically perform better than females on some measures of non-social processing (e.g. Systemizing). Extremes of these sex-typical cognitive profiles are associated with the development and maintenance of certain psychiatric disorders. For example, the autism-psychosis model predicts psychosis spectrum conditions can be characterized as a cognitive pattern of very poor Systemizing alongside superior Empathizing ability (autism demonstrating the diametrically opposing cognitive profile). However, little experimental research has been carried out to date testing the cognitive profile associated with psychosis. Methods: The present study used a large non-clinical sample to investigate the relationship between a {"}jumping to conclusions{"} (JTC) reasoning bias commonly seen in patients with delusions and measures of Empathizing and Systemizing. Results: Those showing a JTC bias demonstrated greater Empathizing and reduced Systemizing compared to a non-JTC group, irrespective of biological sex. Sex differences were identified in Empathizing and Systemizing but not the JTC. Conclusions: These results show a cognitive pattern consistent with predictions from the autism-psychosis model. In a non-clinical population, a reasoning bias associated with delusions is associated with an Emphasizing/Systemizing profile opposite to that characteristic of autism.",
keywords = "clinical psychology, delusions, Empathizing, global/local processing, hyper-mentalizing, jumping to conclusions, psychosis, Systemizing, theory of mind",
author = "Mark Brosnan and Chris Ashwin and Tim Gamble",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/17522439.2011.626526",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "71--81",
number = "1",

}

Greater Empathizing and reduced Systemizing in people who show a jumping to conclusions bias in the general population : Implications for psychosis. / Brosnan, Mark; Ashwin, Chris; Gamble, Tim.

Vol. 5, No. 1, 2013, p. 71-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Greater Empathizing and reduced Systemizing in people who show a jumping to conclusions bias in the general population

T2 - Implications for psychosis

AU - Brosnan, Mark

AU - Ashwin, Chris

AU - Gamble, Tim

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: Females generally perform better than males on some measures of social processing (e.g. Empathizing), while males typically perform better than females on some measures of non-social processing (e.g. Systemizing). Extremes of these sex-typical cognitive profiles are associated with the development and maintenance of certain psychiatric disorders. For example, the autism-psychosis model predicts psychosis spectrum conditions can be characterized as a cognitive pattern of very poor Systemizing alongside superior Empathizing ability (autism demonstrating the diametrically opposing cognitive profile). However, little experimental research has been carried out to date testing the cognitive profile associated with psychosis. Methods: The present study used a large non-clinical sample to investigate the relationship between a "jumping to conclusions" (JTC) reasoning bias commonly seen in patients with delusions and measures of Empathizing and Systemizing. Results: Those showing a JTC bias demonstrated greater Empathizing and reduced Systemizing compared to a non-JTC group, irrespective of biological sex. Sex differences were identified in Empathizing and Systemizing but not the JTC. Conclusions: These results show a cognitive pattern consistent with predictions from the autism-psychosis model. In a non-clinical population, a reasoning bias associated with delusions is associated with an Emphasizing/Systemizing profile opposite to that characteristic of autism.

AB - Background: Females generally perform better than males on some measures of social processing (e.g. Empathizing), while males typically perform better than females on some measures of non-social processing (e.g. Systemizing). Extremes of these sex-typical cognitive profiles are associated with the development and maintenance of certain psychiatric disorders. For example, the autism-psychosis model predicts psychosis spectrum conditions can be characterized as a cognitive pattern of very poor Systemizing alongside superior Empathizing ability (autism demonstrating the diametrically opposing cognitive profile). However, little experimental research has been carried out to date testing the cognitive profile associated with psychosis. Methods: The present study used a large non-clinical sample to investigate the relationship between a "jumping to conclusions" (JTC) reasoning bias commonly seen in patients with delusions and measures of Empathizing and Systemizing. Results: Those showing a JTC bias demonstrated greater Empathizing and reduced Systemizing compared to a non-JTC group, irrespective of biological sex. Sex differences were identified in Empathizing and Systemizing but not the JTC. Conclusions: These results show a cognitive pattern consistent with predictions from the autism-psychosis model. In a non-clinical population, a reasoning bias associated with delusions is associated with an Emphasizing/Systemizing profile opposite to that characteristic of autism.

KW - clinical psychology

KW - delusions

KW - Empathizing

KW - global/local processing

KW - hyper-mentalizing

KW - jumping to conclusions

KW - psychosis

KW - Systemizing

KW - theory of mind

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873666155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17522439.2011.626526

DO - 10.1080/17522439.2011.626526

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 71

EP - 81

IS - 1

ER -