It takes two: the round-robin methodology for investigative interviewing research

Charlotte A. Hudson, Liam P. Satchell, Nicole Adams-Quackenbush

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Investigative interviews are complex, dyadic, and social interactions typically studied by evaluating interviewers' questioning strategies. In field settings, interviewers naturally vary in their interviewing practice. Thus, it is important to conduct research reflective of idiosyncrasies in witnesses, interviewers, and the resulting unique pairings. This study explored sources of variation in an interview by using a "round-robin" design. Each session of the study involved five witnesses observing five separate events. Witnesses were then simultaneously, but independently interviewed by four different interviewers, or completed a self-administered written interview. This sequence was repeated until each witness had seen every event and had been interviewed by each interviewer. Over nine sessions (N = 45) this produced 225 total interviews. Individual interview performance (accuracy and level of detail) as well as experience (subjective ratings) were then analyzed in relation to the typical performance of the interviewer, the witness, the event, and the unique paring. We found that witnesses and interviewers could have an effect on statement quality; however, the unique interview experience variance had the greatest influence on interview performance. This study presents the round-robin methodology as a useful tool to study realistic variation in interviewer, witness, and dyad behavior. The preprint of this paper is available at psyarxiv.com/tv5gz/, and materials and data are available at osf.io/ef634/files/.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2181
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume9
Issue numberNOV
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • Dyadic research
  • Individual differences
  • Interviewer
  • Investigative interview
  • Round-robin analysis
  • Witness

Cite this

Hudson, Charlotte A. ; Satchell, Liam P. ; Adams-Quackenbush, Nicole. / It takes two: the round-robin methodology for investigative interviewing research. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 9, No. NOV.
@article{9fc7948ed8cf4e0cbe8d3cb19fdaae16,
title = "It takes two: the round-robin methodology for investigative interviewing research",
abstract = "Investigative interviews are complex, dyadic, and social interactions typically studied by evaluating interviewers' questioning strategies. In field settings, interviewers naturally vary in their interviewing practice. Thus, it is important to conduct research reflective of idiosyncrasies in witnesses, interviewers, and the resulting unique pairings. This study explored sources of variation in an interview by using a {"}round-robin{"} design. Each session of the study involved five witnesses observing five separate events. Witnesses were then simultaneously, but independently interviewed by four different interviewers, or completed a self-administered written interview. This sequence was repeated until each witness had seen every event and had been interviewed by each interviewer. Over nine sessions (N = 45) this produced 225 total interviews. Individual interview performance (accuracy and level of detail) as well as experience (subjective ratings) were then analyzed in relation to the typical performance of the interviewer, the witness, the event, and the unique paring. We found that witnesses and interviewers could have an effect on statement quality; however, the unique interview experience variance had the greatest influence on interview performance. This study presents the round-robin methodology as a useful tool to study realistic variation in interviewer, witness, and dyad behavior. The preprint of this paper is available at psyarxiv.com/tv5gz/, and materials and data are available at osf.io/ef634/files/.",
keywords = "Dyadic research, Individual differences, Interviewer, Investigative interview, Round-robin analysis, Witness",
author = "Hudson, {Charlotte A.} and Satchell, {Liam P.} and Nicole Adams-Quackenbush",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "13",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02181",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
number = "NOV",

}

Hudson, CA, Satchell, LP & Adams-Quackenbush, N 2018, 'It takes two: the round-robin methodology for investigative interviewing research', Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 9, no. NOV, 2181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02181

It takes two: the round-robin methodology for investigative interviewing research. / Hudson, Charlotte A.; Satchell, Liam P.; Adams-Quackenbush, Nicole.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, No. NOV, 2181, 13.11.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - It takes two: the round-robin methodology for investigative interviewing research

AU - Hudson, Charlotte A.

AU - Satchell, Liam P.

AU - Adams-Quackenbush, Nicole

PY - 2018/11/13

Y1 - 2018/11/13

N2 - Investigative interviews are complex, dyadic, and social interactions typically studied by evaluating interviewers' questioning strategies. In field settings, interviewers naturally vary in their interviewing practice. Thus, it is important to conduct research reflective of idiosyncrasies in witnesses, interviewers, and the resulting unique pairings. This study explored sources of variation in an interview by using a "round-robin" design. Each session of the study involved five witnesses observing five separate events. Witnesses were then simultaneously, but independently interviewed by four different interviewers, or completed a self-administered written interview. This sequence was repeated until each witness had seen every event and had been interviewed by each interviewer. Over nine sessions (N = 45) this produced 225 total interviews. Individual interview performance (accuracy and level of detail) as well as experience (subjective ratings) were then analyzed in relation to the typical performance of the interviewer, the witness, the event, and the unique paring. We found that witnesses and interviewers could have an effect on statement quality; however, the unique interview experience variance had the greatest influence on interview performance. This study presents the round-robin methodology as a useful tool to study realistic variation in interviewer, witness, and dyad behavior. The preprint of this paper is available at psyarxiv.com/tv5gz/, and materials and data are available at osf.io/ef634/files/.

AB - Investigative interviews are complex, dyadic, and social interactions typically studied by evaluating interviewers' questioning strategies. In field settings, interviewers naturally vary in their interviewing practice. Thus, it is important to conduct research reflective of idiosyncrasies in witnesses, interviewers, and the resulting unique pairings. This study explored sources of variation in an interview by using a "round-robin" design. Each session of the study involved five witnesses observing five separate events. Witnesses were then simultaneously, but independently interviewed by four different interviewers, or completed a self-administered written interview. This sequence was repeated until each witness had seen every event and had been interviewed by each interviewer. Over nine sessions (N = 45) this produced 225 total interviews. Individual interview performance (accuracy and level of detail) as well as experience (subjective ratings) were then analyzed in relation to the typical performance of the interviewer, the witness, the event, and the unique paring. We found that witnesses and interviewers could have an effect on statement quality; however, the unique interview experience variance had the greatest influence on interview performance. This study presents the round-robin methodology as a useful tool to study realistic variation in interviewer, witness, and dyad behavior. The preprint of this paper is available at psyarxiv.com/tv5gz/, and materials and data are available at osf.io/ef634/files/.

KW - Dyadic research

KW - Individual differences

KW - Interviewer

KW - Investigative interview

KW - Round-robin analysis

KW - Witness

UR - https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/it-takes-two-the-roundrobin-methodology-for-investigative-interviewing-research(8cbcc3c5-b83f-4fcc-8768-a2b72143fe40).html

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02181

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02181

M3 - Article

VL - 9

IS - NOV

M1 - 2181

ER -