Learning Nature in Schools: Benjamin contra Dietzgen on nature’s ‘free gifts’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

When we learn nature, do we encounter her as 'free' in the sense of having neither cost nor price? Is she something 'given'? And is that which nature offers us ‘gratis’? In the UK, many schoolchildren have been encouraged to ‘give thanks’ for nature’s gifts. But why, if she is free, give thanks; and thanks to whom? If one learns to encounter nature as 'free', is she then really free for the taking? Walter Benjamin notably derided Joseph Dietzgen for regarding what nature supplies to humanity as ‘gratis’, and long argument has continued among Marxists since Benjamin's time concerning how we regard nature’s 'gifts'. This paper addresses the ideological appropriation of nature, and makes this a pedagogical question best approached through readings of Benjamin and Dietzgen. It does so in a context where education policy reflects little if any concern with the acquisition of a disposition towards nature among children.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-354
Number of pages16
JournalPolicy Futures in Education
Volume17
Issue number3
Early online date3 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • schools
  • marxism
  • climate change
  • environmental education
  • pessimism
  • Climate change
  • UK
  • Marxism

Cite this

@article{6e2661a6ac7d46438356eb4da72f72bf,
title = "Learning Nature in Schools:: Benjamin contra Dietzgen on nature’s ‘free gifts’",
abstract = "When we learn nature, do we encounter her as 'free' in the sense of having neither cost nor price? Is she something 'given'? And is that which nature offers us ‘gratis’? In the UK, many schoolchildren have been encouraged to ‘give thanks’ for nature’s gifts. But why, if she is free, give thanks; and thanks to whom? If one learns to encounter nature as 'free', is she then really free for the taking? Walter Benjamin notably derided Joseph Dietzgen for regarding what nature supplies to humanity as ‘gratis’, and long argument has continued among Marxists since Benjamin's time concerning how we regard nature’s 'gifts'. This paper addresses the ideological appropriation of nature, and makes this a pedagogical question best approached through readings of Benjamin and Dietzgen. It does so in a context where education policy reflects little if any concern with the acquisition of a disposition towards nature among children.",
keywords = "schools, marxism, climate change, environmental education, pessimism, Climate change, UK, Marxism",
author = "Simon Boxley",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1177/1478210318824248",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "339--354",
number = "3",

}

Learning Nature in Schools: Benjamin contra Dietzgen on nature’s ‘free gifts’ . / Boxley, Simon.

Vol. 17, No. 3, 22.01.2019, p. 339-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning Nature in Schools:

T2 - Benjamin contra Dietzgen on nature’s ‘free gifts’

AU - Boxley, Simon

PY - 2019/1/22

Y1 - 2019/1/22

N2 - When we learn nature, do we encounter her as 'free' in the sense of having neither cost nor price? Is she something 'given'? And is that which nature offers us ‘gratis’? In the UK, many schoolchildren have been encouraged to ‘give thanks’ for nature’s gifts. But why, if she is free, give thanks; and thanks to whom? If one learns to encounter nature as 'free', is she then really free for the taking? Walter Benjamin notably derided Joseph Dietzgen for regarding what nature supplies to humanity as ‘gratis’, and long argument has continued among Marxists since Benjamin's time concerning how we regard nature’s 'gifts'. This paper addresses the ideological appropriation of nature, and makes this a pedagogical question best approached through readings of Benjamin and Dietzgen. It does so in a context where education policy reflects little if any concern with the acquisition of a disposition towards nature among children.

AB - When we learn nature, do we encounter her as 'free' in the sense of having neither cost nor price? Is she something 'given'? And is that which nature offers us ‘gratis’? In the UK, many schoolchildren have been encouraged to ‘give thanks’ for nature’s gifts. But why, if she is free, give thanks; and thanks to whom? If one learns to encounter nature as 'free', is she then really free for the taking? Walter Benjamin notably derided Joseph Dietzgen for regarding what nature supplies to humanity as ‘gratis’, and long argument has continued among Marxists since Benjamin's time concerning how we regard nature’s 'gifts'. This paper addresses the ideological appropriation of nature, and makes this a pedagogical question best approached through readings of Benjamin and Dietzgen. It does so in a context where education policy reflects little if any concern with the acquisition of a disposition towards nature among children.

KW - schools

KW - marxism

KW - climate change

KW - environmental education

KW - pessimism

KW - Climate change

KW - UK

KW - Marxism

U2 - 10.1177/1478210318824248

DO - 10.1177/1478210318824248

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 339

EP - 354

IS - 3

ER -