Mental time travel ability and the mental reinstatement of context for crime witnesses.

J.H Smith-Spark, J. Bartimus, Rachel Wilcock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Mental time travel ability marks how well the phenomenological aspects of events are mentally re-experienced during recall. The Cognitive Interview (CI) elicits eyewitness information. One of its techniques, Mental Reinstatement of Context (MRC), asks eyewitnesses to reinstate the incident's context mentally before recall. Fifty-six participants watched a simulated crime video. Self-report measures were then taken to estimate general mental time travel ability. Participants were questioned subsequently about the video. Eyewitness performance under MRC was compared with the CI's Report Everything (RE) technique, wherein eyewitnesses recall everything they can but with no invitation to mentally reinstate the context. There was no effect of interview condition on accuracy of recall; however, general mental time travel ability was positively associated with the amount of correct and incorrect information produced under MRC, but not RE, conditions. This is the first empirical demonstration that MRC instructions engage the mental time travel capacities they purport to.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
JournalConsciousness and Cognition
Volume48
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Eyewitness memory
  • Cognitive Interview
  • Mental time travel

Cite this

@article{9739927254504417add37b2f49acd5cd,
title = "Mental time travel ability and the mental reinstatement of context for crime witnesses.",
abstract = "Mental time travel ability marks how well the phenomenological aspects of events are mentally re-experienced during recall. The Cognitive Interview (CI) elicits eyewitness information. One of its techniques, Mental Reinstatement of Context (MRC), asks eyewitnesses to reinstate the incident's context mentally before recall. Fifty-six participants watched a simulated crime video. Self-report measures were then taken to estimate general mental time travel ability. Participants were questioned subsequently about the video. Eyewitness performance under MRC was compared with the CI's Report Everything (RE) technique, wherein eyewitnesses recall everything they can but with no invitation to mentally reinstate the context. There was no effect of interview condition on accuracy of recall; however, general mental time travel ability was positively associated with the amount of correct and incorrect information produced under MRC, but not RE, conditions. This is the first empirical demonstration that MRC instructions engage the mental time travel capacities they purport to.",
keywords = "Eyewitness memory, Cognitive Interview, Mental time travel",
author = "J.H Smith-Spark and J. Bartimus and Rachel Wilcock",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.concog.2016.10.002",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "1--10",

}

Mental time travel ability and the mental reinstatement of context for crime witnesses. / Smith-Spark, J.H; Bartimus, J.; Wilcock, Rachel.

Vol. 48, 24.10.2016, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental time travel ability and the mental reinstatement of context for crime witnesses.

AU - Smith-Spark, J.H

AU - Bartimus, J.

AU - Wilcock, Rachel

PY - 2016/10/24

Y1 - 2016/10/24

N2 - Mental time travel ability marks how well the phenomenological aspects of events are mentally re-experienced during recall. The Cognitive Interview (CI) elicits eyewitness information. One of its techniques, Mental Reinstatement of Context (MRC), asks eyewitnesses to reinstate the incident's context mentally before recall. Fifty-six participants watched a simulated crime video. Self-report measures were then taken to estimate general mental time travel ability. Participants were questioned subsequently about the video. Eyewitness performance under MRC was compared with the CI's Report Everything (RE) technique, wherein eyewitnesses recall everything they can but with no invitation to mentally reinstate the context. There was no effect of interview condition on accuracy of recall; however, general mental time travel ability was positively associated with the amount of correct and incorrect information produced under MRC, but not RE, conditions. This is the first empirical demonstration that MRC instructions engage the mental time travel capacities they purport to.

AB - Mental time travel ability marks how well the phenomenological aspects of events are mentally re-experienced during recall. The Cognitive Interview (CI) elicits eyewitness information. One of its techniques, Mental Reinstatement of Context (MRC), asks eyewitnesses to reinstate the incident's context mentally before recall. Fifty-six participants watched a simulated crime video. Self-report measures were then taken to estimate general mental time travel ability. Participants were questioned subsequently about the video. Eyewitness performance under MRC was compared with the CI's Report Everything (RE) technique, wherein eyewitnesses recall everything they can but with no invitation to mentally reinstate the context. There was no effect of interview condition on accuracy of recall; however, general mental time travel ability was positively associated with the amount of correct and incorrect information produced under MRC, but not RE, conditions. This is the first empirical demonstration that MRC instructions engage the mental time travel capacities they purport to.

KW - Eyewitness memory

KW - Cognitive Interview

KW - Mental time travel

U2 - 10.1016/j.concog.2016.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.concog.2016.10.002

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 1

EP - 10

ER -