Mock Juror Perceptions of Child Witnesses on the Autism Spectrum: The Impact of Providing Diagnostic Labels and Information About Autism

Laura Crane, Rachel Wilcock, Katie Maras, Wing Chui, Carmen Marti-Sanchez, Lucy Henry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research suggests that autistic children can provide accurate and forensically useful eyewitness evidence. However, members of a jury also rely on non-verbal behaviours when judging the credibility of a witness, and this could determine the verdict of a case. We presented mock jurors with videos (from an experimental study) of one of two child witnesses on the autism spectrum being interviewed about a mock minor crime. Results demonstrated that providing jurors with generic information about autism and/or informing them of the child’s diagnostic label differentially affected credibility ratings, but not for both children. Implications for how to present information about child witnesses with autism to a jury – highlighting the need for approaches tailored to individual children – are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2018

Keywords

  • autism
  • criminal justice
  • jury,
  • credibility
  • eyewitness memory

Cite this

@article{0d33383a33c440549ed32fa2aaff1f9d,
title = "Mock Juror Perceptions of Child Witnesses on the Autism Spectrum: The Impact of Providing Diagnostic Labels and Information About Autism",
abstract = "Research suggests that autistic children can provide accurate and forensically useful eyewitness evidence. However, members of a jury also rely on non-verbal behaviours when judging the credibility of a witness, and this could determine the verdict of a case. We presented mock jurors with videos (from an experimental study) of one of two child witnesses on the autism spectrum being interviewed about a mock minor crime. Results demonstrated that providing jurors with generic information about autism and/or informing them of the child’s diagnostic label differentially affected credibility ratings, but not for both children. Implications for how to present information about child witnesses with autism to a jury – highlighting the need for approaches tailored to individual children – are discussed.",
keywords = "autism, criminal justice, jury,, credibility, eyewitness memory",
author = "Laura Crane and Rachel Wilcock and Katie Maras and Wing Chui and Carmen Marti-Sanchez and Lucy Henry",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1007/s10803-018-3700-0",
language = "English",

}

Mock Juror Perceptions of Child Witnesses on the Autism Spectrum : The Impact of Providing Diagnostic Labels and Information About Autism. / Crane, Laura ; Wilcock, Rachel; Maras, Katie; Chui, Wing; Marti-Sanchez, Carmen; Henry, Lucy.

28.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mock Juror Perceptions of Child Witnesses on the Autism Spectrum

T2 - The Impact of Providing Diagnostic Labels and Information About Autism

AU - Crane, Laura

AU - Wilcock, Rachel

AU - Maras, Katie

AU - Chui, Wing

AU - Marti-Sanchez, Carmen

AU - Henry, Lucy

PY - 2018/7/28

Y1 - 2018/7/28

N2 - Research suggests that autistic children can provide accurate and forensically useful eyewitness evidence. However, members of a jury also rely on non-verbal behaviours when judging the credibility of a witness, and this could determine the verdict of a case. We presented mock jurors with videos (from an experimental study) of one of two child witnesses on the autism spectrum being interviewed about a mock minor crime. Results demonstrated that providing jurors with generic information about autism and/or informing them of the child’s diagnostic label differentially affected credibility ratings, but not for both children. Implications for how to present information about child witnesses with autism to a jury – highlighting the need for approaches tailored to individual children – are discussed.

AB - Research suggests that autistic children can provide accurate and forensically useful eyewitness evidence. However, members of a jury also rely on non-verbal behaviours when judging the credibility of a witness, and this could determine the verdict of a case. We presented mock jurors with videos (from an experimental study) of one of two child witnesses on the autism spectrum being interviewed about a mock minor crime. Results demonstrated that providing jurors with generic information about autism and/or informing them of the child’s diagnostic label differentially affected credibility ratings, but not for both children. Implications for how to present information about child witnesses with autism to a jury – highlighting the need for approaches tailored to individual children – are discussed.

KW - autism

KW - criminal justice

KW - jury,

KW - credibility

KW - eyewitness memory

U2 - 10.1007/s10803-018-3700-0

DO - 10.1007/s10803-018-3700-0

M3 - Article

ER -