Ruminating on the nature of intelligence: personality predicts implicit theories and educational persistence

Liam Satchell, Sherria Hoskins, Philip Corr, Roger Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Research in schools has shown that those who hold Incremental Theories of Intelligence (i.e. intelligence can grow and improve) generally outperform those who hold Entity Theories of Intelligence (i.e. intelligence is ‘fixed’ and cannot improve). Recently, there have been attempts to establish a stronger theoretical explanation for individual differences in educational success, by relating the Big Five’s Conscientiousness to higher school attainment. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate further relationships between Implicit Theories of Intelligence and a well-known neurologically based theory of personality, namely Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST). A sample of 319 adults completed personality measures of RST, the Big Five and Implicit Theories of Intelligence, as well as a proxy measure for educational persistence (highest academic qualification achieved). The results showed that participants who hold an Incremental (growth) Theory of Intelligence score higher on the RST Behavioural Approach System traits oriented toward future reward and the Big Five’s Conscientiousness. Those that hold an Entity (fixed) Theory of Intelligence score higher on RST Behavioural Inhibition System and the Big Five Neuroticism measure. The paper discusses the implications of these relationships and explores the benefits of the simultaneous use of both theoretically underpinned and applied measures of individual differences.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-114
Number of pages6
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume113
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2017

Keywords

  • implicit theories of intelligence
  • reinforcement sensitivity theory
  • big five
  • academic persistence

Cite this

Satchell, Liam ; Hoskins, Sherria ; Corr, Philip ; Moore, Roger. / Ruminating on the nature of intelligence: personality predicts implicit theories and educational persistence. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 2017 ; Vol. 113. pp. 109-114.
@article{67ab2a516bc34ce8b88169006b410bde,
title = "Ruminating on the nature of intelligence: personality predicts implicit theories and educational persistence",
abstract = "Research in schools has shown that those who hold Incremental Theories of Intelligence (i.e. intelligence can grow and improve) generally outperform those who hold Entity Theories of Intelligence (i.e. intelligence is ‘fixed’ and cannot improve). Recently, there have been attempts to establish a stronger theoretical explanation for individual differences in educational success, by relating the Big Five’s Conscientiousness to higher school attainment. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate further relationships between Implicit Theories of Intelligence and a well-known neurologically based theory of personality, namely Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST). A sample of 319 adults completed personality measures of RST, the Big Five and Implicit Theories of Intelligence, as well as a proxy measure for educational persistence (highest academic qualification achieved). The results showed that participants who hold an Incremental (growth) Theory of Intelligence score higher on the RST Behavioural Approach System traits oriented toward future reward and the Big Five’s Conscientiousness. Those that hold an Entity (fixed) Theory of Intelligence score higher on RST Behavioural Inhibition System and the Big Five Neuroticism measure. The paper discusses the implications of these relationships and explores the benefits of the simultaneous use of both theoretically underpinned and applied measures of individual differences.",
keywords = "implicit theories of intelligence, reinforcement sensitivity theory, big five, academic persistence",
author = "Liam Satchell and Sherria Hoskins and Philip Corr and Roger Moore",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.025",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "109--114",

}

Ruminating on the nature of intelligence: personality predicts implicit theories and educational persistence. / Satchell, Liam; Hoskins, Sherria; Corr, Philip; Moore, Roger.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 113, 15.07.2017, p. 109-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ruminating on the nature of intelligence: personality predicts implicit theories and educational persistence

AU - Satchell, Liam

AU - Hoskins, Sherria

AU - Corr, Philip

AU - Moore, Roger

PY - 2017/7/15

Y1 - 2017/7/15

N2 - Research in schools has shown that those who hold Incremental Theories of Intelligence (i.e. intelligence can grow and improve) generally outperform those who hold Entity Theories of Intelligence (i.e. intelligence is ‘fixed’ and cannot improve). Recently, there have been attempts to establish a stronger theoretical explanation for individual differences in educational success, by relating the Big Five’s Conscientiousness to higher school attainment. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate further relationships between Implicit Theories of Intelligence and a well-known neurologically based theory of personality, namely Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST). A sample of 319 adults completed personality measures of RST, the Big Five and Implicit Theories of Intelligence, as well as a proxy measure for educational persistence (highest academic qualification achieved). The results showed that participants who hold an Incremental (growth) Theory of Intelligence score higher on the RST Behavioural Approach System traits oriented toward future reward and the Big Five’s Conscientiousness. Those that hold an Entity (fixed) Theory of Intelligence score higher on RST Behavioural Inhibition System and the Big Five Neuroticism measure. The paper discusses the implications of these relationships and explores the benefits of the simultaneous use of both theoretically underpinned and applied measures of individual differences.

AB - Research in schools has shown that those who hold Incremental Theories of Intelligence (i.e. intelligence can grow and improve) generally outperform those who hold Entity Theories of Intelligence (i.e. intelligence is ‘fixed’ and cannot improve). Recently, there have been attempts to establish a stronger theoretical explanation for individual differences in educational success, by relating the Big Five’s Conscientiousness to higher school attainment. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate further relationships between Implicit Theories of Intelligence and a well-known neurologically based theory of personality, namely Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST). A sample of 319 adults completed personality measures of RST, the Big Five and Implicit Theories of Intelligence, as well as a proxy measure for educational persistence (highest academic qualification achieved). The results showed that participants who hold an Incremental (growth) Theory of Intelligence score higher on the RST Behavioural Approach System traits oriented toward future reward and the Big Five’s Conscientiousness. Those that hold an Entity (fixed) Theory of Intelligence score higher on RST Behavioural Inhibition System and the Big Five Neuroticism measure. The paper discusses the implications of these relationships and explores the benefits of the simultaneous use of both theoretically underpinned and applied measures of individual differences.

KW - implicit theories of intelligence

KW - reinforcement sensitivity theory

KW - big five

KW - academic persistence

UR - https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/ruminating-on-the-nature-of-intelligence(94b0dab0-242b-4788-a12f-45bf5b722d85).html

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.025

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.025

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 109

EP - 114

ER -