The Equality Paradox: Sexual Harassment and Gender Inequality in a UK University

The incremental progression of women into academia, as both students and staff, has disrupted, but not dismantled, cultures and practices of gender inequality. The #MeToo and other movements have engendered a focus on the prevalence, and normalisation, of sexual violence on campus. Most UK studies focus on intra-student or staff-student experiences which constructs it as either a student issue or individualised transgressions. In this article we draw on data from a convergent mix-methods study in a UK university, in which quantitative and qualitative data were collected from staff and students on experiences of sexual harassment and perceptions of gender inequality. In this article we focus specifically on staff data. We apply Kelly’s (2007) ‘conducive context’ analysis to argue that a cultural practice of gender inequality within the institution is the scaffold for sexual harassment. This invidious circle (Burri and Timmer, 2017) of gender inequality and sexual harassment is mutually supportive and sustaining. Using this one university as a case study we argue that for women in academia parity in entry has not equated to parity of experience – with women having to navigate the paradox of the academy as an ostensibly welcoming, yet hostile, environment.