The political geographies of diaspora strategies: rethinking the 'sending state'

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Diaspora strategies have been at the forefront of new studies of thepolitical geographies of state-led transnationalism, contributing important insights into the widespread socio-economic impacts of initiatives used to engage émigrés in extra-territorial nation-building. The conceptualization of the ‘ sending state’ as a central territorialized bureaucratic form has however contributed to binary framings of diasporic space by failing to capture the range of interplays in and between multiple scales and spaces that characterises the formulation of a states’ diaspora strategies, their evolution over time, and their variegated material outcomes. Alternative conceptualizations of the ‘ sending state’ as a multi-sited network of governing entities disrupts binary readings of diaspora space, but it is argued here that such an approach reproduces top-down views of political agency. The review concludes by suggesting that scholars of diaspora strategies would benefit from exploring assemblage thinking, where a sustained engagement with spatial emergence and distributed socio-material agencies has the potential to reveal the dynamic topological connections through which diasporic spatio-political formations emerge, endure and may be disrupted. This has implications for understanding the impacts of diaspora strategies on individual diasporic subjectivities and ideas of common citizenship.
Original languageEnglish
JournalGeography Compass
Volume11
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2017

Keywords

  • diaspora
  • Diaspora engagement
  • Emigration policies
  • Sending state
  • Diaspora strategies

Cite this

@article{beb95a46ce11485d8759d7b9a516d2ac,
title = "The political geographies of diaspora strategies: rethinking the 'sending state'",
abstract = "Diaspora strategies have been at the forefront of new studies of thepolitical geographies of state-led transnationalism, contributing important insights into the widespread socio-economic impacts of initiatives used to engage {\'e}migr{\'e}s in extra-territorial nation-building. The conceptualization of the ‘ sending state’ as a central territorialized bureaucratic form has however contributed to binary framings of diasporic space by failing to capture the range of interplays in and between multiple scales and spaces that characterises the formulation of a states’ diaspora strategies, their evolution over time, and their variegated material outcomes. Alternative conceptualizations of the ‘ sending state’ as a multi-sited network of governing entities disrupts binary readings of diaspora space, but it is argued here that such an approach reproduces top-down views of political agency. The review concludes by suggesting that scholars of diaspora strategies would benefit from exploring assemblage thinking, where a sustained engagement with spatial emergence and distributed socio-material agencies has the potential to reveal the dynamic topological connections through which diasporic spatio-political formations emerge, endure and may be disrupted. This has implications for understanding the impacts of diaspora strategies on individual diasporic subjectivities and ideas of common citizenship.",
keywords = "diaspora, Diaspora engagement, Emigration policies, Sending state, Diaspora strategies",
author = "Jen Dickinson",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "15",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
number = "2",

}

The political geographies of diaspora strategies: rethinking the 'sending state'. / Dickinson, Jen.

In: Geography Compass, Vol. 11, No. 2, 15.02.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The political geographies of diaspora strategies: rethinking the 'sending state'

AU - Dickinson, Jen

PY - 2017/2/15

Y1 - 2017/2/15

N2 - Diaspora strategies have been at the forefront of new studies of thepolitical geographies of state-led transnationalism, contributing important insights into the widespread socio-economic impacts of initiatives used to engage émigrés in extra-territorial nation-building. The conceptualization of the ‘ sending state’ as a central territorialized bureaucratic form has however contributed to binary framings of diasporic space by failing to capture the range of interplays in and between multiple scales and spaces that characterises the formulation of a states’ diaspora strategies, their evolution over time, and their variegated material outcomes. Alternative conceptualizations of the ‘ sending state’ as a multi-sited network of governing entities disrupts binary readings of diaspora space, but it is argued here that such an approach reproduces top-down views of political agency. The review concludes by suggesting that scholars of diaspora strategies would benefit from exploring assemblage thinking, where a sustained engagement with spatial emergence and distributed socio-material agencies has the potential to reveal the dynamic topological connections through which diasporic spatio-political formations emerge, endure and may be disrupted. This has implications for understanding the impacts of diaspora strategies on individual diasporic subjectivities and ideas of common citizenship.

AB - Diaspora strategies have been at the forefront of new studies of thepolitical geographies of state-led transnationalism, contributing important insights into the widespread socio-economic impacts of initiatives used to engage émigrés in extra-territorial nation-building. The conceptualization of the ‘ sending state’ as a central territorialized bureaucratic form has however contributed to binary framings of diasporic space by failing to capture the range of interplays in and between multiple scales and spaces that characterises the formulation of a states’ diaspora strategies, their evolution over time, and their variegated material outcomes. Alternative conceptualizations of the ‘ sending state’ as a multi-sited network of governing entities disrupts binary readings of diaspora space, but it is argued here that such an approach reproduces top-down views of political agency. The review concludes by suggesting that scholars of diaspora strategies would benefit from exploring assemblage thinking, where a sustained engagement with spatial emergence and distributed socio-material agencies has the potential to reveal the dynamic topological connections through which diasporic spatio-political formations emerge, endure and may be disrupted. This has implications for understanding the impacts of diaspora strategies on individual diasporic subjectivities and ideas of common citizenship.

KW - diaspora

KW - Diaspora engagement

KW - Emigration policies

KW - Sending state

KW - Diaspora strategies

M3 - Article

VL - 11

IS - 2

ER -