Validity and reliability of lower-limb pulse-wave velocity assessments using an oscillometric technique

Keeron Stone, Simon Fryer, Elizabeth Kelsch, Kathryn Burnet, gabriel zieff, James Faulkner, Daniel Credeur, Danielle Lambrick, Erik Hanson, Lee Stoner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background There is a growing interest in the deleterious effects of sedentary behaviour on lower‐limb arterial health. To permit further investigation, including in larger epidemiological studies, there is a need to identify lower‐limb arterial health assessment tools that are valid and reliable, yet simple to administer. Purpose This study sought to determine the validity and between‐day reliability of femoral‐ankle pulse‐wave velocity (faPWV) measures obtained using an oscillometric‐based device (SphygmocCor XCEL) in supine and seated positions. Doppler ultrasound (US) was used as the criterion. Methods A total of 47 healthy adults were recruited for validity (n = 32) and reliability (n = 15) analyses. Validity was determined by measuring faPWV in seated and supine positions using the XCEL and US devices, in a randomised order. Between‐day reliability was determined by measuring seated and supine faPWV using the XCEL on 3 different mornings, separated by a maximum of 7 days. Results The validity criteria (absolute standard error of estimate [aSEE] < 1.0 m s−1) was met in the supine (aSEE = 0.8 m s−1, 95% CI: 0.4‐1.0), but not the seated (aSEE = 1.2 m s−1, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.2) position. Intras‐class correlation coefficient estimates revealed the XCEL demonstrated good reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.93), but poor reliability in the seated position (ICC = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.63). Conclusions The oscillometric XCEL device can be used to determine lower‐limb PWV with acceptable validity and reliability in the conventionally recommended supine position, but not the seated position.
LanguageEnglish
JournalExperimental Physiology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Doppler ultrasound
  • arterial stiffness
  • posture
  • pulse wave analysis

Cite this

Stone, Keeron ; Fryer, Simon ; Kelsch, Elizabeth ; Burnet, Kathryn ; zieff, gabriel ; Faulkner, James ; Credeur, Daniel ; Lambrick, Danielle ; Hanson, Erik ; Stoner, Lee. / Validity and reliability of lower-limb pulse-wave velocity assessments using an oscillometric technique. 2019.
@article{79f3c3f95e5949089919b679ef706975,
title = "Validity and reliability of lower-limb pulse-wave velocity assessments using an oscillometric technique",
abstract = "Background There is a growing interest in the deleterious effects of sedentary behaviour on lower‐limb arterial health. To permit further investigation, including in larger epidemiological studies, there is a need to identify lower‐limb arterial health assessment tools that are valid and reliable, yet simple to administer. Purpose This study sought to determine the validity and between‐day reliability of femoral‐ankle pulse‐wave velocity (faPWV) measures obtained using an oscillometric‐based device (SphygmocCor XCEL) in supine and seated positions. Doppler ultrasound (US) was used as the criterion. Methods A total of 47 healthy adults were recruited for validity (n = 32) and reliability (n = 15) analyses. Validity was determined by measuring faPWV in seated and supine positions using the XCEL and US devices, in a randomised order. Between‐day reliability was determined by measuring seated and supine faPWV using the XCEL on 3 different mornings, separated by a maximum of 7 days. Results The validity criteria (absolute standard error of estimate [aSEE] < 1.0 m s−1) was met in the supine (aSEE = 0.8 m s−1, 95{\%} CI: 0.4‐1.0), but not the seated (aSEE = 1.2 m s−1, 95{\%} CI: 1.1, 1.2) position. Intras‐class correlation coefficient estimates revealed the XCEL demonstrated good reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.83, 95{\%} CI: 0.65, 0.93), but poor reliability in the seated position (ICC = 0.29, 95{\%} CI: 0.23, 0.63). Conclusions The oscillometric XCEL device can be used to determine lower‐limb PWV with acceptable validity and reliability in the conventionally recommended supine position, but not the seated position.",
keywords = "Doppler ultrasound, arterial stiffness, posture, pulse wave analysis",
author = "Keeron Stone and Simon Fryer and Elizabeth Kelsch and Kathryn Burnet and gabriel zieff and James Faulkner and Daniel Credeur and Danielle Lambrick and Erik Hanson and Lee Stoner",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1113/EP087444",
language = "English",

}

Stone, K, Fryer, S, Kelsch, E, Burnet, K, zieff, G, Faulkner, J, Credeur, D, Lambrick, D, Hanson, E & Stoner, L 2019, 'Validity and reliability of lower-limb pulse-wave velocity assessments using an oscillometric technique'. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP087444

Validity and reliability of lower-limb pulse-wave velocity assessments using an oscillometric technique. / Stone, Keeron; Fryer, Simon; Kelsch, Elizabeth ; Burnet, Kathryn; zieff, gabriel; Faulkner, James; Credeur, Daniel; Lambrick, Danielle; Hanson, Erik; Stoner, Lee.

16.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity and reliability of lower-limb pulse-wave velocity assessments using an oscillometric technique

AU - Stone, Keeron

AU - Fryer, Simon

AU - Kelsch, Elizabeth

AU - Burnet, Kathryn

AU - zieff, gabriel

AU - Faulkner, James

AU - Credeur, Daniel

AU - Lambrick, Danielle

AU - Hanson, Erik

AU - Stoner, Lee

PY - 2019/2/16

Y1 - 2019/2/16

N2 - Background There is a growing interest in the deleterious effects of sedentary behaviour on lower‐limb arterial health. To permit further investigation, including in larger epidemiological studies, there is a need to identify lower‐limb arterial health assessment tools that are valid and reliable, yet simple to administer. Purpose This study sought to determine the validity and between‐day reliability of femoral‐ankle pulse‐wave velocity (faPWV) measures obtained using an oscillometric‐based device (SphygmocCor XCEL) in supine and seated positions. Doppler ultrasound (US) was used as the criterion. Methods A total of 47 healthy adults were recruited for validity (n = 32) and reliability (n = 15) analyses. Validity was determined by measuring faPWV in seated and supine positions using the XCEL and US devices, in a randomised order. Between‐day reliability was determined by measuring seated and supine faPWV using the XCEL on 3 different mornings, separated by a maximum of 7 days. Results The validity criteria (absolute standard error of estimate [aSEE] < 1.0 m s−1) was met in the supine (aSEE = 0.8 m s−1, 95% CI: 0.4‐1.0), but not the seated (aSEE = 1.2 m s−1, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.2) position. Intras‐class correlation coefficient estimates revealed the XCEL demonstrated good reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.93), but poor reliability in the seated position (ICC = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.63). Conclusions The oscillometric XCEL device can be used to determine lower‐limb PWV with acceptable validity and reliability in the conventionally recommended supine position, but not the seated position.

AB - Background There is a growing interest in the deleterious effects of sedentary behaviour on lower‐limb arterial health. To permit further investigation, including in larger epidemiological studies, there is a need to identify lower‐limb arterial health assessment tools that are valid and reliable, yet simple to administer. Purpose This study sought to determine the validity and between‐day reliability of femoral‐ankle pulse‐wave velocity (faPWV) measures obtained using an oscillometric‐based device (SphygmocCor XCEL) in supine and seated positions. Doppler ultrasound (US) was used as the criterion. Methods A total of 47 healthy adults were recruited for validity (n = 32) and reliability (n = 15) analyses. Validity was determined by measuring faPWV in seated and supine positions using the XCEL and US devices, in a randomised order. Between‐day reliability was determined by measuring seated and supine faPWV using the XCEL on 3 different mornings, separated by a maximum of 7 days. Results The validity criteria (absolute standard error of estimate [aSEE] < 1.0 m s−1) was met in the supine (aSEE = 0.8 m s−1, 95% CI: 0.4‐1.0), but not the seated (aSEE = 1.2 m s−1, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.2) position. Intras‐class correlation coefficient estimates revealed the XCEL demonstrated good reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.93), but poor reliability in the seated position (ICC = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.63). Conclusions The oscillometric XCEL device can be used to determine lower‐limb PWV with acceptable validity and reliability in the conventionally recommended supine position, but not the seated position.

KW - Doppler ultrasound

KW - arterial stiffness

KW - posture

KW - pulse wave analysis

U2 - 10.1113/EP087444

DO - 10.1113/EP087444

M3 - Article

ER -