What’s so funny ‘bout peace, love and understanding? Further reflections on the limits of prejudice reduction as a model of social change for psychologists.

Manuela Thomae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper aims to encourage greater reflexivity about the limits of prejudice reduction as a model of social change, particularly when applied to societies characterised by historically entrenched patterns of inequality. We begin by outlining some underlying values and assumptions of this model. We then elaborate how our research on political attitudes in post-apartheid South Africa has led us to question, qualify and sometimes reject those assumptions and move towards a ‘contextualist’ perspective on the efficacy of different models of social change. We agree that the project of getting us to like one another may be crucial for producing change in some contexts. In other contexts, however, it is an epiphenomenon that distracts psychologists from the main causes of, and solutions to, problems such as race, class, or gender discrimination. In still others, with an irony that is evidenced increasingly by research, prejudice reduction may actually contribute to the very problem it is designed to resolve. That is, it may diminish the extent to which social injustice is acknowledged, rejected and challenged.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-252
JournalJournal of Social and Political Psychology
Volume1
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 16 Dec 2013

Keywords

  • prejudice
  • prejudice reduction
  • intergroup relations
  • social change

Cite this

@article{7cfa540a3f4b49508dac60f66db251ac,
title = "What’s so funny ‘bout peace, love and understanding? Further reflections on the limits of prejudice reduction as a model of social change for psychologists.",
abstract = "This paper aims to encourage greater reflexivity about the limits of prejudice reduction as a model of social change, particularly when applied to societies characterised by historically entrenched patterns of inequality. We begin by outlining some underlying values and assumptions of this model. We then elaborate how our research on political attitudes in post-apartheid South Africa has led us to question, qualify and sometimes reject those assumptions and move towards a ‘contextualist’ perspective on the efficacy of different models of social change. We agree that the project of getting us to like one another may be crucial for producing change in some contexts. In other contexts, however, it is an epiphenomenon that distracts psychologists from the main causes of, and solutions to, problems such as race, class, or gender discrimination. In still others, with an irony that is evidenced increasingly by research, prejudice reduction may actually contribute to the very problem it is designed to resolve. That is, it may diminish the extent to which social injustice is acknowledged, rejected and challenged.",
keywords = "prejudice, prejudice reduction, intergroup relations, social change",
author = "Manuela Thomae",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "16",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "239--252",
number = "1",

}

What’s so funny ‘bout peace, love and understanding? Further reflections on the limits of prejudice reduction as a model of social change for psychologists. / Thomae, Manuela.

In: Journal of Social and Political Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 16.12.2013, p. 239-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What’s so funny ‘bout peace, love and understanding? Further reflections on the limits of prejudice reduction as a model of social change for psychologists.

AU - Thomae, Manuela

PY - 2013/12/16

Y1 - 2013/12/16

N2 - This paper aims to encourage greater reflexivity about the limits of prejudice reduction as a model of social change, particularly when applied to societies characterised by historically entrenched patterns of inequality. We begin by outlining some underlying values and assumptions of this model. We then elaborate how our research on political attitudes in post-apartheid South Africa has led us to question, qualify and sometimes reject those assumptions and move towards a ‘contextualist’ perspective on the efficacy of different models of social change. We agree that the project of getting us to like one another may be crucial for producing change in some contexts. In other contexts, however, it is an epiphenomenon that distracts psychologists from the main causes of, and solutions to, problems such as race, class, or gender discrimination. In still others, with an irony that is evidenced increasingly by research, prejudice reduction may actually contribute to the very problem it is designed to resolve. That is, it may diminish the extent to which social injustice is acknowledged, rejected and challenged.

AB - This paper aims to encourage greater reflexivity about the limits of prejudice reduction as a model of social change, particularly when applied to societies characterised by historically entrenched patterns of inequality. We begin by outlining some underlying values and assumptions of this model. We then elaborate how our research on political attitudes in post-apartheid South Africa has led us to question, qualify and sometimes reject those assumptions and move towards a ‘contextualist’ perspective on the efficacy of different models of social change. We agree that the project of getting us to like one another may be crucial for producing change in some contexts. In other contexts, however, it is an epiphenomenon that distracts psychologists from the main causes of, and solutions to, problems such as race, class, or gender discrimination. In still others, with an irony that is evidenced increasingly by research, prejudice reduction may actually contribute to the very problem it is designed to resolve. That is, it may diminish the extent to which social injustice is acknowledged, rejected and challenged.

KW - prejudice

KW - prejudice reduction

KW - intergroup relations

KW - social change

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 239

EP - 252

IS - 1

ER -