Afterword: turning and twisting histories of women's education: reading reflexively and diffractively

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The Afterword discusses continuities and differences in how researchers are positioned in feminist themes and emerging feminist perspectives as they play out in debates around researcher reflexivity and around diffraction as methodological strategies. The first section of the Afterword highlights the ongoing commitment to reflexivity when reading sources and generating knowledge in women’s and gender history. The second part focuses on the challenge to reflexivity posed by diffractive methodologies that argue that knowledge is created from being entangled in the world, rather than reflecting on or during the production of historical work. This section discusses two examples of diffractive practice in archival research taken from the special issue. The third section outlines diffractive reading in more detail and provides two examples of diffractive reading of texts. Finally, the Afterword invites readers to undertake a diffractive reading of the articles in the special issue and provides some questions about diffraction for consideration.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages15
JournalWomen's History Review
Early online date3 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 May 2019

Keywords

  • diffrction
  • reflexivity
  • women's histories
  • education

Cite this

@article{0d7af1462fa8468d882aa01ca3275bc3,
title = "Afterword: turning and twisting histories of women's education: reading reflexively and diffractively",
abstract = "The Afterword discusses continuities and differences in how researchers are positioned in feminist themes and emerging feminist perspectives as they play out in debates around researcher reflexivity and around diffraction as methodological strategies. The first section of the Afterword highlights the ongoing commitment to reflexivity when reading sources and generating knowledge in women’s and gender history. The second part focuses on the challenge to reflexivity posed by diffractive methodologies that argue that knowledge is created from being entangled in the world, rather than reflecting on or during the production of historical work. This section discusses two examples of diffractive practice in archival research taken from the special issue. The third section outlines diffractive reading in more detail and provides two examples of diffractive reading of texts. Finally, the Afterword invites readers to undertake a diffractive reading of the articles in the special issue and provides some questions about diffraction for consideration.",
keywords = "diffrction, reflexivity, women's histories, education",
author = "Susan Anderson-Faithful and Joyce Goodman",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/09612025.2019.1611134",
language = "English",

}

Afterword: turning and twisting histories of women's education: reading reflexively and diffractively. / Anderson-Faithful, Susan; Goodman, Joyce.

03.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Afterword: turning and twisting histories of women's education: reading reflexively and diffractively

AU - Anderson-Faithful, Susan

AU - Goodman, Joyce

PY - 2019/5/3

Y1 - 2019/5/3

N2 - The Afterword discusses continuities and differences in how researchers are positioned in feminist themes and emerging feminist perspectives as they play out in debates around researcher reflexivity and around diffraction as methodological strategies. The first section of the Afterword highlights the ongoing commitment to reflexivity when reading sources and generating knowledge in women’s and gender history. The second part focuses on the challenge to reflexivity posed by diffractive methodologies that argue that knowledge is created from being entangled in the world, rather than reflecting on or during the production of historical work. This section discusses two examples of diffractive practice in archival research taken from the special issue. The third section outlines diffractive reading in more detail and provides two examples of diffractive reading of texts. Finally, the Afterword invites readers to undertake a diffractive reading of the articles in the special issue and provides some questions about diffraction for consideration.

AB - The Afterword discusses continuities and differences in how researchers are positioned in feminist themes and emerging feminist perspectives as they play out in debates around researcher reflexivity and around diffraction as methodological strategies. The first section of the Afterword highlights the ongoing commitment to reflexivity when reading sources and generating knowledge in women’s and gender history. The second part focuses on the challenge to reflexivity posed by diffractive methodologies that argue that knowledge is created from being entangled in the world, rather than reflecting on or during the production of historical work. This section discusses two examples of diffractive practice in archival research taken from the special issue. The third section outlines diffractive reading in more detail and provides two examples of diffractive reading of texts. Finally, the Afterword invites readers to undertake a diffractive reading of the articles in the special issue and provides some questions about diffraction for consideration.

KW - diffrction

KW - reflexivity

KW - women's histories

KW - education

U2 - 10.1080/09612025.2019.1611134

DO - 10.1080/09612025.2019.1611134

M3 - Article

ER -