Creative and credible evaluation for arts, health and wellbeing: opportunities and challenges of co-production.

Norma Daykin, Karen Gray, Mel McCree, Jane Willis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: This paper reports findings from a one-year UKknowledge exchange (KE) project completed in 2015. Stakeholders’ experiences of evaluation were explored in order to develop online resources to strengthen knowledge and capacity within the arts and health sector (www.creativeandcredible.co.uk).Methods: The project used mixed methods, including a survey,interviews and focus groups, guided by a Stakeholder Reference Group comprised of 26 leading UK evaluators, researchers, artists, health professionals, commissioners and funders.Results: The project identified opportunities for arts arising from current health and social care policy agendas. It also identified challenges including the lack of agreed evaluation frameworks and difficulties in evaluation practice.Conclusions: Co-production between stakeholders is needed tostrengthen evaluation practice and support the development of the arts and health sector. Effective co-production can be undermined by structural and cultural barriers as well as unequal stakeholder relationships. The paper discusses recent initiatives designed to support best practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-138
JournalArts and Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice.
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Sep 2016

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • methodologies
  • public health
  • commissioning
  • co-production

Cite this