“I just didn't want to trust it at all”: Atrial fibrillation patient's treatment experience of rivaroxaban and warfarin

Dan Sly, Margaret Husted, Lynn McKeague, Tamara Everington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
In the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), anticoagulant medications such as warfarin and rivaroxaban are commonly prescribed to reduce the risk of ischaemic strokes, and other thromboembolic events. Research has highlighted advantages and disadvantages of each of these medications, but there remains an absence of qualitative evidence regarding the lived experiences of AF patients. The present study helps address this gap and obtain a greater understanding of the patient experience and beliefs surrounding their anticoagulant medication.

Method
Semi-structured qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of 20 participants (10 warfarin, 10 rivaroxaban). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.

Results
Data analysis led to the generation of three key themes: positive perceptions of medication, distrust of alternatives, and inconsistencies in support experiences.

Conclusions
Positive perceptions of one anticoagulant medication (ACM) and distrust of alternatives may influence patients' confidence in switching medications. This is potentially problematic where there is a lack of patient engagement in medication changes, as seen during the COVID pandemic. Gaps in patient understanding of anticoagulation, including lack of clarity around medications selection and misconceptions about treatment, were evident. By addressing these misconceptions, clinicians may be better positioned to support people with AF in self-management of their ACM.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Oct 2021

Keywords

  • DOACs
  • anticoagulants
  • atrial fibrillation
  • patient experience
  • quality of life

Cite this